=begin pod :kind("Language") :subkind("Language") :category("reference")

=TITLE Traps to avoid

=SUBTITLE Traps to avoid when getting started with Raku

When learning a programming language, possibly with the background of
being familiar with another programming language, there are always some
things that can surprise you and might cost valuable time in debugging
and discovery.

This document aims to show common misconceptions in order to avoid them.

During the making of Raku great pains were taken to get rid of warts
in the syntax.  When you whack one wart, though, sometimes another pops
up.  So a lot of time was spent finding the minimum number of warts or
trying to put them where they would rarely be seen.  Because of this,
Raku's warts are in different places than you may expect them to be
when coming from another language.

=head1 Variables and constants

=head2 Constants are computed at compile time

Constants are computed at compile time, so if you use them in modules
keep in mind that their values will be frozen due to precompilation of
the module itself:

=for code :solo
# WRONG (most likely):
unit module Something::Or::Other;
constant $config-file = "config.txt".IO.slurp;

The C<$config-file> will be slurped during precompilation and changes
to C<config.txt> file won't be re-loaded when you start the script
again; only when the module is re-compiled.

Avoid L<using a container|/language/containers> and prefer
L<binding a value|/language/containers#Binding>
to a variable that offers a
behavior similar to a constant, but allowing the value to get updated:

=for code :solo
# Good; file gets updated from 'config.txt' file on each script run:
unit module Something::Or::Other;
my $config-file := "config.txt".IO.slurp;

=head2 Assigning to C<Nil> produces a different value, usually C<Any>

Actually, assigning to C<Nil>
L<reverts the variable to its default value|/type/Nil>. So:

=begin code
my @a = 4, 8, 15, 16;
@a[2] = Nil;
say @a; # OUTPUT: «[4 8 (Any) 16]␤»
=end code

In this case, C<Any> is the default value of an C<Array> element.

You can purposefully assign C<Nil> as a default value:

=begin code
my %h is default(Nil) = a => Nil;
say %h; # OUTPUT: «Hash %h = {:a(Nil)}␤»
=end code

Or bind a value to C<Nil> if that is the result you want:

=begin code :preamble<my @a = 1,2,3,4;>
@a[3] := Nil;
say @a; # OUTPUT: «[4 8 (Any) Nil]␤»
=end code

This trap might be hidden in the result of functions, such as matches:

=begin code
my $result2 = 'abcdef' ~~ / dex /;
say "Result2 is { $result2.^name }"; # OUTPUT: «Result2 is Any␤»
=end code

A L<C<Match> will be C<Nil>|/language/regexes#Literals>
if it finds nothing; however assigning C<Nil> to C<$result2> above
will result in its default value, which is C<Any> as shown.

=head2 Using a block to interpolate anon state vars

The programmer intended for the code to count the number of times the
routine is called, but the counter is not increasing:

    =begin code
    sub count-it { say "Count is {$++}" }
    count-it;
    count-it;

    # OUTPUT:
    # Count is 0
    # Count is 0
    =end code

When it comes to state variables, the block in which the vars are
declared gets cloned —and vars get initialized anew— whenever that
block's block is re-entered. This lets constructs like the one below
behave appropriately; the state variable inside the loop gets
initialized anew each time the sub is called:

    =begin code
    sub count-it {
        for ^3 {
            state $count = 0;
            say "Count is $count";
            $count++;
        }
    }

    count-it;
    say "…and again…";
    count-it;


    # OUTPUT:
    # Count is 0
    # Count is 1
    # Count is 2
    # …and again…
    # Count is 0
    # Count is 1
    # Count is 2
    =end code

The same layout exists in our buggy program. The C<{ }> inside a
double-quoted string isn't merely an interpolation to execute a piece of
code. It's actually its own block, which is just as in the example above
gets cloned each time the sub is entered, re-initializing our state
variable. To get the right count, we need to get rid of that inner
block, using a scalar contextualizer to interpolate our piece of code
instead:

    =begin code
    sub count-it { say "Count is $($++)" }
    count-it;
    count-it;

    # OUTPUT:
    # Count is 0
    # Count is 1
    =end code

Alternatively, you can also use the L<concatenation operator|/routine/~>
instead:

    =begin code
    sub count-it { say "Count is " ~ $++ }
    =end code

=head2 Using set subroutines on C<Associative> when the value is falsy

Using L<(cont)|/routine/(cont) , infix  ∋>, L<∋|/routine/(cont),%20infix%20∋>, L<∌|/routine/∌>,
L<(elem)|/routine/(elem), infix ∈>, L<∈|/routine/(elem), infix ∈>, or L<∉|/routine/∉> on classes
implementing L<Associative|/type/Associative> will return C<False> if the value
of the key is falsy:

=begin code
enum Foo «a b»;
say Foo.enums ∋ 'a';

# OUTPUT:
# False
=end code

Instead, use C<:exists>:

=begin code
enum Foo «a b»;
say Foo.enums<a>:exists;

# OUTPUT:
# True
=end code

=head1 Blocks

=head2 Beware of empty "blocks"

Curly braces are used to declare blocks. However, empty curly braces
will declare a hash.

=begin code
$ = {say 42;} # Block
$ = {;}       # Block
$ = {…}       # Block
$ = { }       # Hash
=end code

You can use the second form if you effectively want to declare an empty
block:

    my &does-nothing = {;};
    say does-nothing(33); # OUTPUT: «Nil␤»


=head1 Objects

=head2 Assigning to attributes

Newcomers often think that, because attributes with accessors are
declared as C<has $.x>, they can assign to C<$.x> inside the class.
That's not the case.

For example

=begin code
class Point {
    has $.x;
    has $.y;
    method double {
        $.x *= 2;   # WRONG
        $.y *= 2;   # WRONG
        self;
    }
}

say Point.new(x => 1, y => -2).double.x
# OUTPUT: «Cannot assign to an immutable value␤»
=end code

the first line inside the method C<double> is marked with C<# WRONG> because
C<$.x>, short for C<$( self.x )>, is a call to a read-only accessor.

The syntax C<has $.x> is short for something like C<has $!x; method x() {
$!x }>, so the actual attribute is called C<$!x>, and a read-only accessor
method is automatically generated.

Thus the correct way to write the method C<double> is

=for code :preamble<has ($.x, $.y)>
method double {
    $!x *= 2;
    $!y *= 2;
    self;
}

which operates on the attributes directly.

=head2 C<BUILD> prevents automatic attribute initialization from constructor
arguments

When you define your own C<BUILD> submethod, you must take care of
initializing all attributes by yourself. For example

=begin code
class A {
    has $.x;
    has $.y;
    submethod BUILD {
        $!y = 18;
    }
}

say A.new(x => 42).x;       # OUTPUT: «Any␤»
=end code

leaves C<$!x> uninitialized, because the custom C<BUILD> doesn't
initialize it.

B<Note:> Consider using L<TWEAK|/language/objects#index-entry-TWEAK>
instead. L<Rakudo|/language/glossary#Rakudo> supports
L<TWEAK|/language/objects#index-entry-TWEAK> method since release
2016.11.

One possible remedy is to explicitly initialize the attribute in
C<BUILD>:

=for code :preamble<has ($.x, $.y)>
submethod BUILD(:$x) {
    $!y = 18;
    $!x := $x;
}

which can be shortened to:

=for code :preamble<has ($.x, $.y)>
submethod BUILD(:$!x) {
    $!y = 18;
}

=head1 Whitespace

=head2 Whitespace in regexes does not match literally

=for code
say 'a b' ~~ /a b/; # OUTPUT: «False␤»

Whitespace in regexes is, by default, considered an optional filler without
semantics, just like in the rest of the Raku language.

Ways to match whitespace:

=item C<\s> to match any one whitespace, C<\s+> to match at least one
=item C<' '> (a blank in quotes) to match a single blank
=item C<\t>, C<\n> for specific whitespace (tab, newline)
=item C<\h>, C<\v> for horizontal, vertical whitespace
=item C<<.ws>>, a built-in rule for whitespace that oftentimes does what
      you actually want it to do
=item with C<m:s/a b/> or C<m:sigspace/a b/>, the blank in the regexes
      matches arbitrary whitespace

=head2 Ambiguities in parsing

While some languages will let you get away with removing as much whitespace
between tokens as possible, Raku is less forgiving. The overarching
mantra is we discourage code golf, so don't scrimp on whitespace (the
more serious underlying reason behind these restrictions is
single-pass parsing and ability to parse Raku programs with virtually
no L<backtracking|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backtracking>).

The common areas you should watch out for are:

=head3 Block vs. Hash slice ambiguity

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
# WRONG; trying to hash-slice a Bool:
while ($++ > 5){ .say }

=begin code
# RIGHT:
while ($++ > 5) { .say }

# EVEN BETTER; Raku does not require parentheses there:
while $++ > 5 { .say }
=end code

=head3 Reduction vs. Array constructor ambiguity

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
# WRONG; ambiguity with `[<]` metaop:
my @a = [[<foo>],];

=begin code
# RIGHT; reductions cannot have spaces in them, so put one in:
my @a = [[ <foo>],];

# No ambiguity here, natural spaces between items suffice to resolve it:
my @a = [[<foo bar ber>],];
=end code

=head3 Less than vs. Word quoting/Associative indexing
=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
# WRONG; trying to index 3 associatively:
say 3<5>4

=begin code
# RIGHT; prefer some extra whitespace around infix operators:
say 3 < 5 > 4
=end code

=head3 Exclusive sequences vs. sequences with Ranges

See the section on L<operator traps|#Exclusive_sequence_operator> for
more information about how the C<...^> operator can be mistaken for
the C<...> operator with a C<^> operator immediately following it. You
must use whitespace correctly to indicate which interpretation will be
followed.

=head1 Captures

=head2 Containers versus values in a capture

Beginners might expect a variable in a C<Capture> to supply its current
value when that C<Capture> is later used.  For example:

=for code
my $a = 2; say join ",", ($a, ++$a);  # OUTPUT: «3,3␤»

Here the C<Capture> contained the B<container> pointed to by C<$a> and the
B<value> of the result of the expression C<++$a>.  Since the C<Capture> must be
reified before C<&say> can use it, the C<++$a> may happen before C<&say> looks
inside the container in C<$a> (and before the C<List> is created with the two
terms) and so it may already be incremented.

Instead, use an expression that produces a value when you want a value.

=for code
my $a = 2; say join ",", (+$a, ++$a); # OUTPUT: «2,3␤»

Or even simpler
=for code
my $a = 2; say  "$a, {++$a}"; # OUTPUT: «2, 3␤»

The same happens in this case:
=begin code
my @arr;
my ($a, $b) = (1,1);
for ^5 {
    ($a,$b) = ($b, $a+$b);
    @arr.push: ($a, $b);
    say @arr
};
=end code

Outputs C<«[(1 2)]␤[(2 3) (2 3)]␤[(3 5) (3 5) (3 5)]␤...>. C<$a> and C<$b> are
not reified until C<say> is called, the value that they have in that precise
moment is the one printed. To avoid that, decontainerize values or take them out
of the variable in some way before using them.

=begin code
my @arr;
my ($a, $b) = (1,1);
for ^5 {
    ($a,$b) = ($b, $a+$b);
    @arr.push: ($a.item, $b.item);
    say @arr
};
=end code

With L<item|/routine/item>, the container will be evaluated in item context, its
value extracted, and the desired outcome achieved.

=head1 C<Cool> tricks

Raku includes a L<Cool|/type/Cool> class, which provides some of the DWIM
behaviors we got used to by coercing arguments when necessary. However, DWIM is
never perfect. Especially with L<List|/type/List>s, which are C<Cool>, there are
many methods that will not do what you probably think they do, including
C<contains>, C<starts-with> or C<index>. Please see some examples in the section
below.

=head2 Strings are not C<List>s, so beware indexing

In Raku, L<strings|/type/Str> are not lists of characters. One
L<cannot iterate|#Strings_are_not_iterable> over them or index into them as you
can with L<lists|/type/List>, despite the name of the L<.index
routine|/type/Str#routine_index>.

=head2 C<List>s become strings, so beware C<.index()>ing

L<List|/type/List> inherits from L<Cool|/type/Cool>, which provides access to
L<.index|/type/Str#routine_index>. Because of the way C<.index>
L<coerces|/type/List#method_Str> a C<List> into a L<Str|/type/Str>, this can
sometimes appear to be returning the index of an element in the list, but
that is not how the behavior is defined.

=for code
my @a = <a b c d>;
say @a.index(‘a’);    # 0
say @a.index('c');    # 4 -- not 2!
say @a.index('b c');  # 2 -- not undefined!
say @a.index(<a b>);  # 0 -- not undefined!

These same caveats apply to L<.rindex|/type/Str#routine_rindex>.

=head2 C<List>s become strings, so beware C<.contains()>

Similarly, L<.contains|/type/List#(Cool)_method_contains> does not look for
elements in the list.

=for code
my @menu = <hamburger fries milkshake>;
say @menu.contains('hamburger');            # True
say @menu.contains('hot dog');              # False
say @menu.contains('milk');                 # True!
say @menu.contains('er fr');                # True!
say @menu.contains(<es mi>);                # True!

If you actually want to check for the presence of an element, use the
L<(cont)|/routine/(elem), infix ∈> operator for single elements, and the
L<<superset|/language/operators#infix_(>=),_infix_⊇>> and L<<strict superset|/language/operators#infix_(>),_infix_⊃>>
operators for multiple elements.

=for code
my @menu = <hamburger fries milkshake>;
say @menu (cont) 'fries';                   # True
say @menu (cont) 'milk';                    # False
say @menu (>) <hamburger fries>;            # True
say @menu (>) <milkshake fries>;            # True (! NB: order doesn't matter)

If you are doing a lot of element testing, you may be better off using
a L<Set|/type/Set>.

=head2 C<Numeric> literals are parsed before coercion

Experienced programmers will probably not be surprised by this, but
Numeric literals will be parsed into their numeric value before being
coerced into a string, which may create nonintuitive results.

=for code
say 0xff.contains(55);      # True
say 0xff.contains(0xf);     # False
say 12_345.contains("23");  # True
say 12_345.contains("2_");  # False

=head2 Getting a random item from a C<List>

A common task is to retrieve one or more random elements from a collection,
but C<List.rand> isn't the way to do that. L<Cool|/type/Cool> provides
L<rand|/routine/rand#class_Cool>, but that first coerces the C<List> into
the number of items in the list, and returns a random real number
between 0 and that value. To get random elements, see L<pick|/routine/pick>
and L<roll|/routine/roll>.

=for code
my @colors = <red orange yellow green blue indigo violet>;
say @colors.rand;       # 2.21921955680514
say @colors.pick;       # orange
say @colors.roll;       # blue
say @colors.pick(2);    # yellow violet  (cannot repeat)
say @colors.roll(3);    # red green red  (can repeat)

=head2 C<List>s numify to their number of elements in numeric context

You want to check whether a number is divisible by any of a set of numbers:

    say 42 %% <11 33 88 55 111 20325>; # OUTPUT: «True␤»

What? There's no single number 42 should be divisible by. However, that list has
6 elements, and 42 is divisible by 6. That's why the output is true. In this
case, you should turn the C<List> into a L<Junction|/type/Junction>:

=for code
say 42 %% <11 33 88 55 111 20325>.any;
# OUTPUT: «any(False, False, False, False, False, False)␤»

which will clearly reveal the falsehood of the divisiveness of all the numbers
in the list, which will be numified separately.

=head1 Arrays

=head2 Referencing the last element of an array

In some languages one could reference the last element of an array by
asking for the "-1th" element of the array, e.g.:

=for code :lang<perl>
my @array = qw{victor alice bob charlie eve};
say @array[-1];    # OUTPUT: «eve␤»

In Raku it is not possible to use negative subscripts, however the same is
achieved by actually using a function, namely C<*-1>.  Thus, accessing the
last element of an array becomes:

=for code
my @array = qw{victor alice bob charlie eve};
say @array[*-1];   # OUTPUT: «eve␤»

Yet another way is to utilize the array's tail method:

=for code
my @array = qw{victor alice bob charlie eve};
say @array.tail;      # OUTPUT: «eve␤»
say @array.tail(2);   # OUTPUT: «(charlie eve)␤»

=head2 Typed array parameters

Quite often new users will happen to write something like:

=for code
sub foo(Array @a) { ... }

...before they have gotten far enough in the documentation to realize that
this is asking for an Array of Arrays.  To say that C<@a> should only accept
Arrays, use instead:

=for code
sub foo(@a where Array) { ... }

It is also common to expect this to work, when it does not:

=for code
sub bar(Int @a) { 42.say };
bar([1, 2, 3]);             # expected Positional[Int] but got Array

The problem here is that [1, 2, 3] is not an C<Array[Int]>, it is a plain
old Array that just happens to have Ints in it.  To get it to work,
the argument must also be an C<Array[Int]>.

=for code :preamble<sub bar (Int @a) { 42.say }>
my Int @b = 1, 2, 3;
bar(@b);                    # OUTPUT: «42␤»
bar(Array[Int].new(1, 2, 3));

This may seem inconvenient, but on the upside it moves the type-check
on what is assigned to C<@b> to where the assignment happens, rather
than requiring every element to be checked on every call.


=head2 Using C<«»> quoting when you don't need it

This trap can be seen in different varieties. Here are some of them:

=begin code
my $x = ‘hello’;
my $y = ‘foo bar’;

my %h = $x => 42, $y => 99;
say %h«$x»;   # ← WRONG; assumption that $x has no whitespace
say %h«$y»;   # ← WRONG; splits ‘foo bar’ by whitespace
say %h«"$y"»; # ← KINDA OK; it works but there is no good reason to do that
say %h{$y};   # ← RIGHT; this is what should be used

run «touch $x»;        # ← WRONG; assumption that only one file will be created
run «touch $y»;        # ← WRONG; will touch file ‘foo’ and ‘bar’
run «touch "$y"»;      # ← WRONG; better, but has a different issue if $y starts with -
run «touch -- "$y"»;   # ← KINDA OK; it works but there is no good enough reason to do that
run ‘touch’, ‘--’, $y; # ← RIGHT; explicit and *always* correct
run <touch -->, $y;    # ← RIGHT; < > are OK, this is short and correct
=end code

Basically, C<«»> quoting is only safe to use if you remember to
I<always> quote your variables. The problem is that it inverts the
default behavior to unsafe variant, so just by forgetting some quotes
you are risking to introduce either a bug or maybe even a security
hole. To stay on the safe side, refrain from using C<«»>.

=head1 Strings

Some problems that might arise when dealing with L<strings|/type/Str>.

=head2 Quotes and interpolation

Interpolation in string literals can be too clever for your own good.

=for code :preamble<my $foo>
# "HTML tags" interpreted as associative indexing:
"$foo<html></html>" eq
"$foo{'html'}{'/html'}"

=for code :preamble<my $foo = { $^x }>
# Parentheses interpreted as call with argument:
"$foo(" ~ @args ~ ")" eq
"$foo(' ~ @args ~ ')"

You can avoid those problems using non-interpolating single quotes and switching
to more liberal interpolation with C<\qq[]> escape sequence:

=for code
my $a = 1;
say '\qq[$a]()$b()';
# OUTPUT: «1()$b()␤»

Another alternative is to use C<Q:c> quoter, and use code blocks C<{}> for
all interpolation:

=for code
my $a = 1;
say Q:c«{$a}()$b()»;
# OUTPUT: «1()$b()␤»

=head2 Strings are not iterable

There are methods that L<Str|/type/Str> inherits from L<Any|/type/Any> that work
on iterables like lists. Iterators on strings contain one element that is the
whole string. To use list-based methods like C<sort>, C<reverse>, you need to
convert the string into a list first.

=for code
say "cba".sort;              # OUTPUT: «(cba)␤»
say "cba".comb.sort.join;    # OUTPUT: «abc␤»

=head2 C<.chars> gets the number of graphemes, not Codepoints

In Raku, L«C<.chars>|/routine/chars» returns the number of graphemes, or user visible
characters. These graphemes could be made up of a letter plus an accent for
example. If you need the number of codepoints, you should use
L«C<.codes>|/routine/codes». If you need the number of bytes when encoded as UTF8, you
should use C<.encode.bytes> to encode the string as UTF8 and then get the number
of bytes.

    say "\c[LATIN SMALL LETTER J WITH CARON, COMBINING DOT BELOW]"; # OUTPUT: «ǰ̣»
    say 'ǰ̣'.codes;        # OUTPUT: «2»
    say 'ǰ̣'.chars;        # OUTPUT: «1»
    say 'ǰ̣'.encode.bytes; # OUTPUT: «4»

For more information on how strings work in Raku, see the L<Unicode page|/language/unicode>.

=head2 All text is normalized by default

Raku normalizes all text into Unicode NFC form (Normalization Form Canonical).
Filenames are the only text not normalized by default. If you are expecting
your strings to maintain a byte for byte representation as the original,
you need to use L«C<UTF8-C8>|/language/unicode#UTF8-C8» when reading or writing
to any filehandles.

=head2 Allomorphs generally follow numeric semantics

L<Str|/type/Str> C<"0"> is C<True>, while L<Numeric|/type/Numeric> is C<False>. So what's the L<Bool|/type/Bool> value of
L<allomorph|/language/glossary#index-entry-Allomorph> C«<0>»?

In general, allomorphs follow L<Numeric|/type/Numeric> semantics, so the ones that I<numerically> evaluate
to zero are C<False>:

    say so   <0>; # OUTPUT: «False␤»
    say so <0e0>; # OUTPUT: «False␤»
    say so <0.0>; # OUTPUT: «False␤»

To force comparison being done for the L<Stringy|/type/Stringy> part of the allomorph, use
L«prefix C<~> operator|/routine/~» or the L<Str|/type/Str> method to coerce the allomorph
to L<Str|/type/Str>, or use the L<chars|/routine/chars> routine to test whether the allomorph has any length:

    say so      ~<0>;     # OUTPUT: «True␤»
    say so       <0>.Str; # OUTPUT: «True␤»
    say so chars <0>;     # OUTPUT: «True␤»

=head2 Case-insensitive comparison of strings

In order to do case-insensitive comparison, you can use C<.fc>
(fold-case). The problem is that people tend to use C<.lc> or C<.uc>,
and it does seem to work within the ASCII range, but fails on other
characters. This is not just a Raku trap, the same applies to other
languages.

=begin code
say ‘groß’.lc eq ‘GROSS’.lc; # ← WRONG; False
say ‘groß’.uc eq ‘GROSS’.uc; # ← WRONG; True, but that's just luck
say ‘groß’.fc eq ‘GROSS’.fc; # ← RIGHT; True
=end code

If you are working with regexes, then there is no need to use C<.fc>
and you can use C<:i> (C<:ignorecase>) adverb instead.


=head1 Pairs

=head2 Constants on the left-hand side of pair notation

Consider this code:

=begin code
enum Animals <Dog Cat>;
my %h := :{ Dog => 42 };
say %h{Dog}; # OUTPUT: «(Any)␤»
=end code

The C<:{ … }> syntax is used to create
L<object hashes|/type/Hash#Non-string_keys_(object_hash)>. The
intentions of someone who wrote that code were to create a hash with
Enum objects as keys (and C<say %h{Dog}> attempts to get a value using
the Enum object to perform the lookup). However, that's not how pair
notation works.

For example, in C«Dog => 42» the key will be a C<Str>. That is, it
doesn't matter if there is a constant, or an enumeration with the
same name. The pair notation will always use the left-hand side as a
string literal, as long as it looks like an identifier.

To avoid this, use C«(Dog) => 42» or C«::Dog => 42».


=head2 Scalar values within C<Pair>

When dealing with L<Scalar|/type/Scalar> values, the C<Pair> holds
the container to the value. This means that
it is possible to reflect changes to the C<Scalar> value
from outside the C<Pair>:

=begin code
my $v = 'value A';
my $pair = Pair.new( 'a', $v );
$pair.say;  # OUTPUT: a => value A

$v = 'value B';
$pair.say; # OUTPUT: a => value B
=end code

Use the method L<freeze|/type/Pair#method_freeze> to force the removal of the
C<Scalar> container from the C<Pair>. For more details see the documentation
about L<Pair|/type/Pair>.

=head1 Sets, bags and mixes

=head2 Sets, bags and mixes do not have a fixed order

When iterating over this kind of objects, an order is not defined.

=begin code
my $set = <a b c>.Set;
.say for $set.list; # OUTPUT: «a => True␤c => True␤b => True␤»
# OUTPUT: «a => True␤c => True␤b => True␤»
# OUTPUT: «c => True␤b => True␤a => True␤»
=end code

Every iteration might (and will) yield a different order, so you cannot trust
a particular sequence of the elements of a set. If order does not matter, just
use them that way. If it does, use C<sort>

    my $set = <a b c>.Set;
    .say for $set.list.sort;  # OUTPUT: «a => True␤b => True␤c => True␤»

In general, sets, bags and mixes are unordered, so you should not depend on them
having a particular order.

=head1 Operators

Some operators commonly shared among other languages were repurposed in Raku
for other, more common, things:

=head2 Junctions

The C<^>, C<|>, and C<&> are I<not> bitwise operators, they create
L<Junctions|/type/Junction>. The corresponding bitwise operators in Raku are:
C<+^>, C<+|>, C<+&> for integers and C<?^>, C<?|>, C<?&> for
L<Bools|/type/Bool>.

=head2 Exclusive sequence operator

Lavish use of whitespace helps readability, but keep in mind infix operators
cannot have any whitespace in them. One such operator is the sequence operator
that excludes right point: C<...^> (or its L<Unicode
equivalent|/language/unicode_ascii> C<…^>).

    say 1... ^5; # OUTPUT: «(1 0 1 2 3 4)␤»
    say 1...^5;  # OUTPUT: «(1 2 3 4)␤»

If you place whitespace between the ellipsis (C<…>) and the caret (C<^>),
it's no longer a single infix operator, but an infix inclusive sequence operator
(C<…>) and a prefix L<Range|/type/Range> operator (C<^>). L«Iterables|/type/Iterable»
are valid endpoints for the sequence operator, so the result you'll get might
not be what you expected.

=head2 String ranges/Sequences

In some languages, using strings as range end points, considers the entire
string when figuring out what the next string should be; loosely treating the
strings as numbers in a large base. Here's the Perl version:

=for code
say join ", ", "az".."bc";
# OUTPUT: «az, ba, bb, bc␤»

Such a range in Raku will produce a different result, where I<each letter>
will be ranged to a corresponding letter in the end point, producing more
complex sequences:

=for code
say join ", ", "az".."bc";
#`{ OUTPUT: «
    az, ay, ax, aw, av, au, at, as, ar, aq, ap, ao, an, am, al, ak, aj, ai, ah,
    ag, af, ae, ad, ac, bz, by, bx, bw, bv, bu, bt, bs, br, bq, bp, bo, bn, bm,
    bl, bk, bj, bi, bh, bg, bf, be, bd, bc
␤»}

=for code
say join ", ", "r2".."t3";
# OUTPUT: «r2, r3, s2, s3, t2, t3␤»

To achieve simpler behavior, similar to the Perl example above, use a
sequence operator that calls C<.succ> method on the starting string:

=for code
say join ", ", ("az", *.succ ... "bc");
# OUTPUT: «az, ba, bb, bc␤»

=head2 Topicalizing operators

The smartmatch operator C<~~> and C<andthen> set the topic C<$_> to
their left-hand-side. In conjunction with implicit method calls on the
topic this can lead to surprising results.

=for code
my &method = { note $_; $_ };
$_ = 'object';
say .&method;
# OUTPUT: «object␤object␤»
say 'topic' ~~ .&method;
# OUTPUT: «topic␤True␤»

In many cases flipping the method call to the LHS will work.

=for code
my &method = { note $_; $_ };
$_ = 'object';
say .&method;
# OUTPUT: «object␤object␤»
say .&method ~~ 'topic';
# OUTPUT: «object␤False␤»

=head2 Fat arrow and constants

The fat arrow operator C«=>» will turn words on its left-hand side to
C<Str> without checking the scope for constants or C<\>-sigiled
variables. Use explicit scoping to get what you mean.

=for code
constant V = 'x';
my %h = V => 'oi‽', ::V => 42;
say %h.raku
# OUTPUT: «{:V("oi‽"), :x(42)}␤»

=head2 Infix operator assignment

Infix operators, both built in and user defined, can be combined with the
assignment operator as this addition example demonstrates:

    my $x = 10;
    $x += 20;
    say $x;     # OUTPUT: «30␤»

For any given infix operator C<op>, C<L op= R> is equivalent to C<L = L op R>
(where C<L> and C<R> are the left and right arguments, respectively).
This means that the following code may not behave as expected:

    my @a = 1, 2, 3;
    @a += 10;
    say @a;  # OUTPUT: «[13]␤»

Coming from a language like C++, this might seem odd. It is important to bear
in mind that C<+=> isn't defined as method on the left hand argument
(here the C<@a> array) but is simply shorthand for:

    my @a = 1, 2, 3;
    @a = @a + 10;
    say @a;  # OUTPUT: «[13]␤»

Here C<@a> is assigned the result of adding C<@a> (which has three elements)
and C<10>; C<13> is therefore placed in C<@a>.

Use the L<hyper form|/language/operators#Hyper_operators>
of the assignment operators instead:

    my @a = 1, 2, 3;
    @a »+=» 10;
    say @a;  # OUTPUT: «[11 12 13]␤»

=head1 Regexes

=head2 C«$x» vs C«<$x>», and C«$(code)» vs C«<{code}>»

Raku offers several constructs to generate regexes at runtime through
interpolation (see their detailed description
L<here|/language/regexes#Regex_interpolation>). When a regex generated this way
contains only literals, the above constructs behave (pairwise) identically, as
if they are equivalent alternatives. As soon as the generated regex contains
metacharacters, however, they behave differently, which may come as a confusing
surprise.

The first two constructs that may easily be confused with each other are
C«$variable» and C«<$variable>»:

    my $variable = 'camelia';
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ /  $variable  /;   # OUTPUT: ｢camelia｣
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ / <$variable> /;   # OUTPUT: ｢camelia｣

Here they act the same because the value of C<$variable> consists of literals.
But when the variable is changed to comprise regex metacharacters the outputs
become different:

    my $variable = '#camelia';
    say ‘I ♥ #camelia’ ~~ /  $variable  /;   # OUTPUT: ｢#camelia｣
    say ‘I ♥ #camelia’ ~~ / <$variable> /;   # !! Error: malformed regex

What happens here is that the string C<#camelia> contains the metacharacter
C<#>. In the context of a regex, this character should be quoted to match
literally; without quoting, the C<#> is parsed as the start of a comment that
runs until the end of the line, which in turn causes the regex not to be
terminated, and thus to be malformed.

Two other constructs that must similarly be distinguished from one another are
C«$(code)» and C«<{code}>». Like before, as long as the (stringified) return
value of C<code> comprises only literals, there is no distinction between the
two:

    my $variable = 'ailemac';
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ / $($variable.flip)   /;   # OUTPUT: ｢camelia｣
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ / <{$variable.flip}>  /;   # OUTPUT: ｢camelia｣

But when the return value is changed to comprise regex metacharacters, the
outputs diverge:

    my $variable = 'ailema.';
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ / $($variable.flip)   /;   # OUTPUT: Nil
    say ‘I ♥ camelia’ ~~ / <{$variable.flip}>  /;   # OUTPUT: ｢camelia｣

In this case the return value of the code is the string C<.amelia>, which
contains the metacharacter C<.>. The above attempt by C«$(code)» to match the
dot literally fails; the attempt by C«<{code}>» to match the dot as a regex
wildcard succeeds. Hence the different outputs.

=head2 C<|> vs C<||>: which branch will win

To match one of several possible alternatives, C<||> or C<|> will be used. But
they are so different.

When there are multiple matching alternations, for those separated by
C<||>, the first matching alternation wins; for those separated by C<|>,
which to win is decided by LTM strategy. See also:
L<documentation on C<||>|/language/regexes#Alternation:_||> and
L<documentation on C<|>|/language/regexes#Longest_alternation:_|>.

For simple regexes just using C<||> instead of C<|>
will get you familiar semantics, but if writing grammars then it's useful to
learn about LTM and declarative prefixes and prefer C<|>. And keep yourself
away from using them in one regex. When you have to do that, add parentheses
and ensure that you know how LTM strategy works to make the code
do what you want.

The trap typically arises when you try to mix both C<|> and C<||> in
the same regex:

=for code
say 42 ~~ / [  0 || 42 ] | 4/; # OUTPUT: «｢4｣␤»
say 42 ~~ / [ 42 ||  0 ] | 4/; # OUTPUT: «｢42｣␤»

The code above may seem like it is producing a wrong result, but the
implementation is actually right.

=head2 C<$/> changes each time a regular expression is matched

Each time a regular expression is matched against something, the special
variable C<$/> holding the result L<Match object|/type/Match>
is changed accordingly to the result of the match (that could also be C<Nil>).

The C<$/> is changed without any regard to the scope the regular expression is matched within.

For further information and examples please see the L<related section in the Regular Expressions documentation|/language/regexes.html#$/_changes_each_time_a_regular_expression_is_matched>.

=head2 C«<foo>» vs. C«< foo>»: named rules vs. quoted lists

Regexes can contain quoted lists; longest token matching is performed on the
list's elements as if a C<|> alternation had been specified (see
L<here|/language/regexes#Quoted_lists_are_LTM_matches> for further information).

Within a regex, the following are lists with a single item, C<'foo'>:

    say 'foo' ~~ /< foo >/;  # OUTPUT: «｢foo｣␤»
    say 'foo' ~~ /< foo>/;   # OUTPUT: «｢foo｣␤»

but this is a call to the named rule C<foo>:

=begin code
say 'foo' ~~ /<foo>/;
# OUTPUT: «No such method 'foo' for invocant of type 'Match'␤ in block <unit> at <unknown file> line 1␤»
=end code

Be wary of the difference; if you intend to use a quoted list, ensure that
whitespace follows the initial C«<».

=head2 Non-capturing, non-global matching in list context

Unlike Perl, non-capturing and non-global matching in list context doesn't produce any values:

    if  'x' ~~ /./ { say 'yes' }  # OUTPUT: «yes␤»
    for 'x' ~~ /./ { say 'yes' }  # NO OUTPUT

This is because its 'list' slot (inherited from Capture class) doesn't get populated with the original Match object:

    say ('x' ~~ /./).list  # OUTPUT: «()␤»

To achieve the desired result, use global matching, capturing parentheses or a list with a trailing comma:

    for 'x' ~~ m:g/./ { say 'yes' }  # OUTPUT: «yes␤»
    for 'x' ~~ /(.)/  { say 'yes' }  # OUTPUT: «yes␤»
    for ('x' ~~ /./,) { say 'yes' }  # OUTPUT: «yes␤»

=head1 Common precedence mistakes

=head2 Adverbs and precedence

Adverbs do have a precedence that may not follow the order of operators that is displayed on your screen. If two operators of equal precedence are followed by an adverb it will pick the first operator it finds in the abstract syntax tree. Use parentheses to help Raku understand what you mean or use operators with looser precedence.

=for code
my %x = a => 42;
say !%x<b>:exists;            # dies with X::AdHoc
say %x<b>:!exists;            # this works
say !(%x<b>:exists);          # works too
say not %x<b>:exists;         # works as well
say True unless %x<b>:exists; # avoid negation altogether

=head2 Ranges and precedence

The loose precedence of C<..> can lead to some errors.  It is usually best to parenthesize ranges when you want to operate on the entire range.

=for code
1..3.say;    # OUTPUT: «3␤» (and warns about useless use of "..")
(1..3).say;  # OUTPUT: «1..3␤»

=head2 Loose Boolean operators

The precedence of C<and>, C<or>, etc. is looser than routine calls. This can
have surprising results for calls to routines that would be operators or
statements in other languages like C<return>, C<last> and many others.

=for code
sub f {
    return True and False;
    # this is actually
    # (return True) and False;
}
say f; # OUTPUT: «True␤»

=head2 Exponentiation operator and prefix minus

=for code
say -1²;   # OUTPUT: «-1␤»
say -1**2; # OUTPUT: «-1␤»

When performing a
L<regular mathematical calculation|https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-1%C2%B2>,
the power takes precedence over the minus; so C<-1²> can be written as C<-(1²)>.
Raku matches these rules of mathematics and the precedence of C<**> operator is
tighter than that of the prefix C<->. If you wish to raise a negative number
to a power, use parentheses:

=for code
say (-1)²;   # OUTPUT: «1␤»
say (-1)**2; # OUTPUT: «1␤»

=head2 Method operator calls and prefix minus

Prefix minus binds looser than dotty method op calls. The prefix minus will be
applied to the return value from the method. To ensure the minus gets
passed as part of the argument, enclose in parenthesis.

=for code
say  -1.abs;  # OUTPUT: «-1␤»
say (-1).abs; # OUTPUT: «1␤»

=head1 Subroutine and method calls

Subroutine and method calls can be made using one of two forms:

=for code :skip-test<illustrates pattern>
foo(...); # function call form, where ... represent the required arguments
foo ...;  # list op form, where ... represent the required arguments

The function call form can cause problems for the unwary when
whitespace is added after the function or method name and before the
opening parenthesis.

First we consider functions with zero or one parameter:

=for code
sub foo() { say 'no arg' }
sub bar($a) { say "one arg: $a" }

Then execute each with and without a space after the name:

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
foo();    # okay: no arg
foo ();   # FAIL: Too many positionals passed; expected 0 arguments but got 1
bar($a);  # okay: one arg: 1
bar ($a); # okay: one arg: 1

Now declare a function of two parameters:

=for code
sub foo($a, $b) { say "two args: $a, $b" }

Execute it with and without the space after the name:

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
foo($a, $b);  # okay: two args: 1, 2
foo ($a, $b); # FAIL: Too few positionals passed; expected 2 arguments but got 1

The lesson is: "be careful with spaces following sub and method names
when using the function call format."  As a general rule, good
practice might be to avoid the space after a function name when using
the function call format.

Note that there are clever ways to eliminate the error with the
function call format and the space, but that is bordering on hackery
and will not be mentioned here.  For more information, consult
L<Functions|/language/functions#Functions>.

Finally, note that, currently, when declaring the functions whitespace
may be used between a function or method name and the parentheses
surrounding the parameter list without problems.

=head2 Named parameters

Many built-in subroutines and method calls accept named parameters and your own
code may accept them as well, but be sure the arguments you pass when calling
your routines are actually named parameters:

=for code
sub foo($a, :$b) { ... }
foo(1, 'b' => 2); # FAIL: Too many positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 2

What happened? That second argument is not a named parameter argument, but a
L<Pair|/type/Pair> passed as a positional argument. If you want a named
parameter it has to look like a name to Perl:

=begin code :preamble<sub foo ($a, *%arg) {}>
foo(1, b => 2); # okay
foo(1, :b(2));  # okay
foo(1, :b<it>); # okay

my $b = 2;
foo(1, :b($b)); # okay, but redundant
foo(1, :$b);    # okay

# Or even...
my %arg = 'b' => 2;
foo(1, |%arg);  # okay too
=end code

That last one may be confusing, but since it uses the C<|> prefix on a
L<Hash|/type/Hash>, which is a special compiler construct indicating you
want to use I<the contents> of the variable as arguments, which for hashes
means to treat them as named arguments.

If you really do want to pass them as pairs you should use a L<List|/type/List>
or L<Capture|/type/Capture> instead:

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
my $list = ('b' => 2),; # this is a List containing a single Pair
foo(|$list, :$b);       # okay: we passed the pair 'b' => 2 to the first argument
foo(1, |$list);         # FAIL: Too many positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 2
foo(1, |$list.Capture); # OK: .Capture call converts all Pair objects to named args in a Capture

=for code :skip-test<illustrates error>
my $cap = \('b' => 2); # a Capture with a single positional value
foo(|$cap, :$b); # okay: we passed the pair 'b' => 2 to the first argument
foo(1, |$cap);   # FAIL: Too many positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 2

A Capture is usually the best option for this as it works exactly like the usual
capturing of routine arguments during a regular call.

The nice thing about the distinction here is that it gives the developer the
option of passing pairs as either named or positional arguments, which can be
handy in various instances.

=head2 Argument count limit

While it is typically unnoticeable, there is a backend-dependent
argument count limit. Any code that does flattening of arbitrarily
sized arrays into arguments won't work if there are too many elements.

=for code
my @a = 1 xx 9999;
my @b;
@b.push: |@a;
say @b.elems # OUTPUT: «9999␤»

=for code
my @a = 1 xx 999999;
my @b;
@b.push: |@a; # OUTPUT: «Too many arguments in flattening array.␤  in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1␤␤»

Avoid this trap by rewriting the code so that there is no
flattening. In the example above, you can replace C<push> with
C<append>. This way, no flattening is required because the array can
be passed as is.

=for code
my @a = 1 xx 999999;
my @b;
@b.append: @a;
say @b.elems # OUTPUT: «999999␤»

=head2 Phasers and implicit return

=begin code
sub returns-ret () {
    CATCH {
        default {}
    }
    "ret";
}

sub doesn't-return-ret () {
    "ret";
    CATCH {
        default {}
    }
}

say returns-ret;        # OUTPUT: «ret»
say doesn't-return-ret;
# BAD: outputs «Nil» and a warning «Useless use of constant string "ret" in sink context (line 13)»
=end code

Code for C<returns-ret> and C<doesn't-return-ret> might look exactly the same, since in principle it does not matter where the L<C<CATCH>|/language/phasers#index-entry-Phasers__CATCH-CATCH> block goes. However, a block is an object and the last object in a C<sub> will be returned, so the C<doesn't-return-ret> will return C<Nil>, and, besides, since "ret" will be now in sink context, it will issue a warning. In case you want to place phasers last for conventional reasons, use the explicit form of C<return>.

=begin code
sub explicitly-return-ret () {
    return "ret";
    CATCH {
        default {}
    }
}
=end code

=head2 C<LEAVE> needs explicit return from a sub to run

As the documentation for the
L<C<LEAVE> phaser indicates|/language/phasers#index-entry-Phasers__LEAVE-LEAVE>
C<LEAVE> runs when a block is exited, "... except when the program exits
abruptly". That is, unlike C<END>, it's going to be invoked only if the block
actually returns in an orderly way. This is why:

=for code
sub a() { LEAVE say "left"; exit 1 }; # No output, it will simply exit

will not run the C<LEAVE> code, since technically it's not returning. On the
other hand, L<C<END>|/language/phasers#END> is a program execution phaser and
will run no matter what

=for code
sub a() {
    END say "Begone"; exit 1
}; a; # OUTPUT: «Begone␤»

=head1 Input and output

=head2 Closing open filehandles and pipes

Unlike some other languages, Raku does not use reference counting,
and so B<the filehandles are NOT closed when they go out of scope>. You
have to explicitly close them either by using L<close|/routine/close> routine or using the
C<:close> argument several of L<IO::Handle's|/type/IO::Handle> methods accept.
See L«C<IO::Handle.close>|/type/IO::Handle#routine_close» for details.

The same rules apply to L<IO::Handle's|/type/IO::Handle> subclass
L<IO::Pipe|/type/IO::Pipe>, which is what you operate on when reading from a L<Proc|/type/Proc> you get
with routines L<run|/routine/run> and L<shell|/routine/shell>.

The caveat applies to L<IO::CatHandle|/type/IO::CatHandle> type as well, though not as severely.
See L«C<IO::CatHandle.close>|/type/IO::CatHandle#method_close» for details.

=head2 IO::Path stringification

Partly for historical reasons and partly by design, an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path> object
L<stringifies|/type/IO::Path#method_Str> without considering its
L«C<CWD> attribute|/type/IO::Path#attribute_CWD», which means if you L<chdir|/routine/chdir>
and then stringify an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path>, or stringify an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path> with custom
C<$!CWD> attribute, the resultant string won't reference the original
filesystem object:

=begin code
with 'foo'.IO {
    .Str.say;       # OUTPUT: «foo␤»
    .relative.say;  # OUTPUT: «foo␤»

    chdir "/tmp";
    .Str.say;       # OUTPUT: «foo␤»
    .relative.say   # OUTPUT: «../home/camelia/foo␤»
}

# Deletes ./foo, not /bar/foo
unlink IO::Path.new("foo", :CWD</bar>).Str
=end code

The easy way to avoid this issue is to not stringify an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path> object at all.
Core routines that work with paths can take an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path> object, so you don't
need to stringify the paths.

If you do have a case where you need a stringified version of an L<IO::Path|/type/IO::Path>, use
L<absolute|/routine/absolute> or L<relative|/routine/relative> methods to stringify it into an absolute or relative
path, respectively.

If you are facing this issue because you use L<chdir|/routine/chdir> in your code,
consider rewriting it in a way that does not involve changing the
current directory. For example, you can pass C<cwd> named argument to
L<run|/routine/run> without having to use C<chdir> around it.

=head2 Splitting the input data into lines

There is a difference between using C<.lines> on
L«C<IO::Handle>|/type/IO::Handle#routine_lines» and on a
L«C<Str>|/type/Str#routine_lines». The trap arises if you start
assuming that both split data the same way.

=begin code
say $_.raku for $*IN.lines # .lines called on IO::Handle
# OUTPUT:
# "foox"
# "fooy\rbar"
# "fooz"
=end code

As you can see in the example above, there was a line which contained
C<\r> (“carriage return” control character). However, the input is
split strictly by C<\n>, so C<\r> was kept as part of the string.

On the other hand, L«C<Str.lines>|/type/Str#routine_lines» attempts to
be “smart” about processing data from different operating
systems. Therefore, it will split by all possible variations of a
newline.

=begin code
say $_.raku for $*IN.slurp(:bin).decode.lines # .lines called on a Str
# OUTPUT:
# "foox"
# "fooy"
# "bar"
# "fooz"
=end code

The rule is quite simple: use
L«C<IO::Handle.lines>|/type/IO::Handle#routine_lines» when working with
programmatically generated output, and
L«C<Str.lines>|/type/Str#routine_lines» when working with user-written
texts.

Use C<$data.split(“\n”)> in cases where you need the behavior of
L«C<IO::Handle.lines>|/type/IO::Handle#routine_lines» but the original
L<IO::Handle|/type/IO::Handle> is not available.

=comment RT#132154

Note that if you really want to slurp the data first, then you will
have to use C<.IO.slurp(:bin).decode.split(“\n”)>. Notice how we use
C<:bin> to prevent it from doing the decoding, only to call C<.decode>
later anyway. All that is needed because C<.slurp> is assuming that
you are working with text and therefore it attempts to be smart about
newlines.

=comment RT#131923

If you are using L<Proc::Async|/type/Proc::Async>, then there is currently no easy way
to make it split data the right way. You can try reading the whole
output and then using L«C<Str.split>|/type/Str#routine_split» (not viable
if you are dealing with large data) or writing your own logic to split
the incoming data the way you need. Same applies if your data
is null-separated.


=head2 Proc::Async and C<print>

When using Proc::Async you should not assume that C<.print> (or any
other similar method) is synchronous. The biggest issue of this trap
is that you will likely not notice the problem by running the code
once, so it may cause a hard-to-detect intermittent fail.

Here is an example that demonstrates the issue:

=begin code
loop {
    my $proc = Proc::Async.new: :w, ‘head’, ‘-n’, ‘1’;
    my $got-something;
    react {
        whenever $proc.stdout.lines { $got-something = True }
        whenever $proc.start        { die ‘FAIL!’ unless $got-something }

        $proc.print: “one\ntwo\nthree\nfour”;
        $proc.close-stdin;
    }
    say $++;
}
=end code

And the output it may produce:

=begin code :lang<text>
0
1
2
3
An operation first awaited:
  in block <unit> at print.p6 line 4

Died with the exception:
    FAIL!
      in block  at print.p6 line 6
=end code

Resolving this is easy because C<.print> returns a promise that you
can await on. The solution is even more beautiful if you are
working in a L<react|/language/concurrency#index-entry-react> block:

=begin code :skip-test<$proc needs a complex initialization>
whenever $proc.print: “one\ntwo\nthree\nfour” {
    $proc.close-stdin;
}
=end code

=head2 Using C<.stdout> without C<.lines>

Method C<.stdout> of L<Proc::Async|/type/Proc::Async> returns a supply that emits
I<chunks> of data, not lines. The trap is that sometimes people assume
it to give lines right away.

=begin code
my $proc = Proc::Async.new(‘cat’, ‘/usr/share/dict/words’);
react {
    whenever $proc.stdout.head(1) { .say } # ← WRONG (most likely)
    whenever $proc.start { }
}
=end code

The output is clearly not just 1 line:

=begin code :lang<text>
A
A's
AMD
AMD's
AOL
AOL's
Aachen
Aachen's
Aaliyah
Aaliyah's
Aaron
Aaron's
Abbas
Abbas's
Abbasid
Abbasid's
Abbott
Abbott's
Abby
=end code

If you want to work with lines, then use C<$proc.stdout.lines>. If
you're after the whole output, then something like this should do the
trick: C<whenever $proc.stdout { $out ~= $_ }>.

=head1 Exception handling

=head2 Sunk C<Proc>

Some methods return a L<Proc|/type/Proc> object. If it represents a failed process, C<Proc> itself
won't be exception-like, but B<sinking it> will cause an L<X::Proc::Unsuccessful|/type/X::Proc::Unsuccessful>
exception to be thrown. That means this construct will throw, despite the C<try> in place:

=for code
try run("raku", "-e", "exit 42");
say "still alive";
# OUTPUT: «The spawned process exited unsuccessfully (exit code: 42)␤»

This is because C<try> receives a C<Proc> and returns it, at which point it sinks and
throws. Explicitly sinking it inside the C<try> avoids the issue
and ensures the exception is thrown inside the C<try>:

=for code
try sink run("raku", "-e", "exit 42");
say "still alive";
# OUTPUT: «still alive␤»

If you're not interested in catching any exceptions, then use an anonymous
variable to keep the returned C<Proc> in; this way it'll never sink:

=for code
$ = run("raku", "-e", "exit 42");
say "still alive";
# OUTPUT: «still alive␤»


=head1 Using shortcuts

=head2 The ^ twigil

Using the C<^> twigil can save a fair amount of time and space when writing out small blocks of code. As an example:

=for code
for 1..8 -> $a, $b { say $a + $b; }

can be shortened to just

=for code
for 1..8 { say $^a + $^b; }

The trouble arises when a person wants to use more complex names for the
variables, instead of just one letter. The C<^> twigil is able to have
the positional variables be out of order and named whatever you want,
but assigns values based on the variable's Unicode ordering. In the
above example, we can have C<$^a> and C<$^b> switch places, and those
variables will keep their positional values. This is because the Unicode
character 'a' comes before the character 'b'. For example:

=for code
# In order
sub f1 { say "$^first $^second"; }
f1 "Hello", "there";    # OUTPUT: «Hello there␤»

=for code
# Out of order
sub f2 { say "$^second $^first"; }
f2 "Hello", "there";    # OUTPUT: «there Hello␤»

Due to the variables allowed to be called anything, this can cause some problems if you are not accustomed to how Raku handles these variables.

=begin code
# BAD NAMING: alphabetically `four` comes first and gets value `1` in it:
for 1..4 { say "$^one $^two $^three $^four"; }    # OUTPUT: «2 4 3 1␤»

# GOOD NAMING: variables' naming makes it clear how they sort alphabetically:
for 1..4 { say "$^a $^b $^c $^d"; }               # OUTPUT: «1 2 3 4␤»
=end code


=head2 Using C<»> and C<map> interchangeably

While L<<C<»>|/language/operators#index-entry-hyper_%3C%3C-hyper_%3E%3E-hyper_%C2%AB-hyper_%C2%BB-Hyper_Operators>>
may look like a shorter way to write C<map>, they differ in some key aspects.

First, the C<»> includes a I<hint> to the compiler that it may
autothread the execution, thus if you're using it to call a routine
that produces side effects, those side effects may be produced out of order
(the result of the operator I<is> kept in order, however).
Also if the routine being invoked accesses a resource, there's the
possibility of a race condition, as multiple invocations may happen
simultaneously, from different threads.

=comment This is an actual output from Rakudo 2015.09
=begin code
<a b c d>».say # OUTPUT: «d␤b␤c␤a␤»
=end code

Second, C<»> checks the L<nodality|/routine/is%20nodal> of the routine being
invoked and based on that will use either L<deepmap|/routine/deepmap> or L<nodemap|/routine/nodemap> to map over
the list, which can be different from how a L<map|/routine/map> call would map over it:
=begin code
say ((1, 2, 3), [^4], '5')».Numeric;       # OUTPUT: «((1 2 3) [0 1 2 3] 5)␤»
say ((1, 2, 3), [^4], '5').map: *.Numeric; # OUTPUT: «(3 4 5)␤»
=end code

The bottom line is that C<map> and C<»> are not interchangeable, but
using one instead of the other is OK as long as you understand the
differences.

=head2 Word splitting in C<« »>

Keep in mind that C<« »> performs word splitting similarly to how
shells do it, so
L<many shell pitfalls|https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls> apply
here as well (especially when using in combination with C<run>):

    my $file = ‘--my arbitrary filename’;
    run ‘touch’, ‘--’, $file;  # RIGHT
    run <touch -->, $file;     # RIGHT

    run «touch -- "$file"»;    # RIGHT but WRONG if you forget quotes
    run «touch -- $file»;      # WRONG; touches ‘--my’, ‘arbitrary’ and ‘filename’
    run ‘touch’, $file;        # WRONG; error from `touch`
    run «touch "$file"»;       # WRONG; error from `touch`

Note that C<--> is required for many programs to disambiguate between
command-line arguments and
L<filenames that begin with hyphens|https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#Filenames_with_leading_dashes>.

=head1 Scope

=head2 Using a C<once> block

The C<once> block is a block of code that will only run once when its parent block is run. As an example:

=for code
my $var = 0;
for 1..10 {
    once { $var++; }
}
say "Variable = $var";    # OUTPUT: «Variable = 1␤»

This functionality also applies to other code blocks like C<sub> and C<while>, not just C<for> loops. Problems arise though, when trying to nest C<once> blocks inside of other code blocks:

=for code
my $var = 0;
for 1..10 {
    do { once { $var++; } }
}
say "Variable = $var";    # OUTPUT: «Variable = 10␤»

In the above example, the C<once> block was nested inside of a code block which was inside of a C<for> loop code block. This causes the C<once> block to run multiple times, because the C<once> block uses state variables to determine whether it has run previously. This means that if the parent code block goes out of scope, then the state variable the C<once> block uses to keep track of if it has run previously, goes out of scope as well. This is why C<once> blocks and C<state> variables can cause some unwanted behavior when buried within more than one code block.

If you want to have something that will emulate the functionality of a once block, but still work when buried a few code blocks deep, we can manually build the functionality of a C<once> block. Using the above example, we can change it so that it will only run once, even when inside the C<do> block by changing the scope of the C<state> variable.

=for code
my $var = 0;
for 1..10 {
    state $run-code = True;
    do { if ($run-code) { $run-code = False; $var++; } }
}
say "Variable = $var";    # OUTPUT: «Variable = 1␤»

In this example, we essentially manually build a C<once> block by making a C<state> variable called C<$run-code> at the highest level that will be run more than once, then checking to see if C<$run-code> is C<True> using a regular C<if>. If the variable C<$run-code> is C<True>, then make the variable C<False> and continue with the code that should only be completed once.

The main difference between using a C<state> variable like the above example and using a regular C<once> block is what scope the C<state> variable is in. The scope for the C<state> variable created by the C<once> block, is the same as where you put the block (imagine that the word 'C<once>' is replaced with a state variable and an C<if> to look at the variable). The example above using C<state> variables works because the variable is at the highest scope that will be repeated; whereas the example that has a C<once> block inside of a C<do>, made the variable within the C<do> block which is not the highest scope that is repeated.

Using a C<once> block inside a class method will cause the once state to carry across all instances of that class.
For example:

=for code
class A {
    method sayit() { once say 'hi' }
}
my $a = A.new;
$a.sayit;      # OUTPUT: «hi␤»
my $b = A.new;
$b.sayit;      # nothing


=head2 C<LEAVE> phaser and C<exit>

Using L«C<LEAVE>|/language/phasers#LEAVE» phaser to perform graceful resource
termination is a common pattern, but it does not cover the case when
the program is stopped with L«C<exit>|/routine/exit».

The following nondeterministic example should demonstrate the
complications of this trap:
=begin code
my $x = say ‘Opened some resource’;
LEAVE say ‘Closing the resource gracefully’ with $x;

exit 42 if rand < ⅓; # ① ｢exit｣ is bad
die ‘Dying because of unhandled exception’ if rand < ½; # ② ｢die｣ is ok
# fallthru ③
=end code

There are three possible results:
=begin code :lang<text>
①
Opened some resource

②
Opened some resource
Closing the resource gracefully
Dying because of unhandled exception
  in block <unit> at print.p6 line 5

③
Opened some resource
Closing the resource gracefully
=end code

A call to C<exit> is part of normal operation for many programs, so
beware unintentional combination of C<LEAVE> phasers and C<exit> calls.

=head2 C<LEAVE> phaser may run sooner than you think

Parameter binding is executed when we're "inside" the routine's block,
which means C<LEAVE> phaser would run when we leave that block if parameter
binding fails when wrong arguments are given:

=begin code
sub foo(Int) {
    my $x = 42;
    LEAVE say $x.Int; # ← WRONG; assumes that $x is set
}
say foo rand; # OUTPUT: «No such method 'Int' for invocant of type 'Any'␤»
=end code

A simple way to avoid this issue is to declare your sub or method a multi,
so the candidate is eliminated during dispatch and the code never gets to
binding anything inside the sub, thus never entering the routine's body:

=begin code
multi foo(Int) {
    my $x = 42;
    LEAVE say $x.Int;
}
say foo rand; # OUTPUT: «Cannot resolve caller foo(Num); none of these signatures match: (Int)␤»
=end code

Another alternative is placing the C<LEAVE> into another block (assuming it's
appropriate for it to be executed when I<that> block is left, not the
routine's body:

=begin code
sub foo(Int) {
    my $x = 42;
    { LEAVE say $x.Int; }
}
say foo rand; # OUTPUT: «Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Int but got Num (0.7289418947969465e0)␤»
=end code

You can also ensure C<LEAVE> can be executed even if the routine is left
due to failed argument binding. In our example, we check C<$x>
L<is defined|/routine/andthen> before doing anything with it.

=begin code
sub foo(Int) {
    my $x = 42;
    LEAVE $x andthen .Int.say;
}
say foo rand; # OUTPUT: «Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Int but got Num (0.8517160389079508e0)␤»
=end code

=head1 Grammars

=head2 Using regexes within grammar's actions

=begin code
# Define a grammar
grammar will-fail {
    token TOP {^ <word> $}
    token word { \w+ }
}

# Define an action class
class will-fail-actions {
    method TOP ($/) {      # <- note the $/ in the signature, which is readonly
        my $foo = ~$/;
        say $foo ~~ /foo/; # <- the regex tries to assign the result to $/ and will fail
    }
}

# Try to parse something...
will-fail.parse('word', :actions(will-fail-actions));
CATCH { default { put .^name, ': ', .Str } };
# OUTPUT: «X::AdHoc: Cannot assign to a readonly variable or a value␤»
=end code

Will fail with C<Cannot assign to a readonly variable ($/) or a value>
on method C<TOP>. The problem here is that regular expressions also
affect C<$/>. Since it is in C<TOP>'s signature, it is a read-only
variable, which is what produces the error. You can safely either use
another variable in the signature or add C<is copy>, this way:

=begin code
method TOP ($/ is copy) { my $foo = ~$/; my $v = $foo ~~ /foo/;  }
=end code

=head2 Using certain names for rules/token/regexes

Grammars are actually a type of classes.

    grammar G {};
    say G.^mro; # OUTPUT: «((G) (Grammar) (Match) (Capture) (Cool) (Any) (Mu))␤»

C<^mro> prints the class hierarchy of this empty grammar, showing all the
superclasses. And these superclasses have their very own methods. Defining a
method in that grammar might clash with the ones inhabiting the class hierarchy:

=begin code :skit-test<throws exception>
grammar g {
    token TOP { <item> };
    token item { 'defined' }
};
say g.parse('defined');
# OUTPUT: «Too many positionals passed; expected 1 argument but got 2␤  in regex item at /tmp/grammar-clash.p6 line 3␤  in regex TOP at /tmp/grammar-clash.p6 line 2␤  in block <unit> at /tmp/grammar-clash.p6 line 5»
=end code

C«item» seems innocuous enough, but it is a L<C<sub> defined in class
C<Mu>|/routine/item>. The message is a bit cryptic and totally unrelated to that
fact, but that is why this is listed as a trap. In general, all subs defined in
any part of the hierarchy are going to cause problems; some methods will too.
For instance, C<CREATE>, C<take> and C<defined> (which are defined in L<Mu|/type/Mu>). In
general, multi methods and simple methods will not have any problem, but it
might not be a good practice to use them as rule names.

Also avoid L<phasers|/language/objects#Object_construction> for rule/token/regex
names: C<TWEAK>, C<BUILD>, C<BUILD-ALL> will throw another kind of exception if
you do that: C<Cannot find method 'match': no method cache and no
.^find_method>, once again only slightly related to what is actually going on.

=head1 Unfortunate generalization

=head2 C<:exists> with more than one key

Let's say you have a hash and you want to use C<:exists> on more than
one element:

=begin code
my %h = a => 1, b => 2;
say ‘a exists’ if %h<a>:exists;   # ← OK; True
say ‘y exists’ if %h<y>:exists;   # ← OK; False
say ‘Huh‽’     if %h<x y>:exists; # ← WRONG; returns a 2-item list
=end code

Did you mean “if C<any> of them exists”, or did you mean that C<all>
of them should exist? Use C<any> or C<all> L<Junction|/type/Junction> to clarify:

=begin code
my %h = a => 1, b => 2;
say ‘x or y’     if any %h<x y>:exists;   # ← RIGHT (any); False
say ‘a, x or y’  if any %h<a x y>:exists; # ← RIGHT (any); True
say ‘a, x and y’ if all %h<a x y>:exists; # ← RIGHT (all); False
say ‘a and b’    if all %h<a b>:exists;   # ← RIGHT (all); True
=end code

The reason why it is always C<True> (without using a junction) is that
it returns a list with L<Bool|/type/Bool> values for each requested
lookup. Non-empty lists always give C<True> when you L<Bool|/type/Bool>ify them,
so the check always succeeds no matter what keys you give it.

=head2 Using C<[…]> metaoperator with a list of lists

Every now and then, someone gets the idea that they can use C<[Z]> to
create the transpose of a list-of-lists:

=begin code
my @matrix = <X Y>, <a b>, <1 2>;
my @transpose = [Z] @matrix; # ← WRONG; but so far so good ↙
say @transpose;              # [(X a 1) (Y b 2)]
=end code

And everything works fine, until you get an input @matrix with
I<exactly one> row (child list):

=begin code
my @matrix = <X Y>,;
my @transpose = [Z] @matrix; # ← WRONG; ↙
say @transpose;              # [(X Y)] – not the expected transpose [(X) (Y)]
=end code

This happens partly because of the
L<single argument rule|/language/functions#Slurpy_conventions>, and
there are other cases when this kind of a generalization may not work.


=head2 Using [~] for concatenating a list of blobs

The L<C<~> infix operator|/routine/~#(Operators)_infix_~> can be used
to concatenate L<Str|/type/Str>s I<or> L<Blob|/type/Blob>s. However, an empty list will
I<always> be reduced to an empty C<Str>. This is due to the fact that,
in the presence of a list with no elements, the
L<reduction|/language/operators#Reduction_operators> metaoperator
returns the
L<identity element|/language/operators#Identity>
for the given operator. Identity element for C<~> is an empty string,
regardless of the kind of elements the list could be populated with.

=for code
my Blob @chunks;
say ([~] @chunks).raku; # OUTPUT: «""␤»


This might cause a problem if you attempt to use the result while
assuming that it is a Blob:

=for code
my Blob @chunks;
say ([~] @chunks).decode;
# OUTPUT: «No such method 'decode' for invocant of type 'Str'. Did you mean 'encode'?␤…»


There are many ways to cover that case. You can avoid C<[ ]>
metaoperator altogether:

=for code
my @chunks;
# …
say Blob.new: |«@chunks; # OUTPUT: «Blob:0x<>␤»


Alternatively, you can initialize the array with an empty Blob:

=for code
my @chunks = Blob.new;
# …
say [~] @chunks; # OUTPUT: «Blob:0x<>␤»


Or you can utilize L<C<||>|/language/operators#infix || > operator to
make it use an empty Blob in case the list is empty:

=for code
my @chunks;
# …
say [~] @chunks || Blob.new; # OUTPUT: «Blob:0x<>␤»


Please note that a similar issue may arise when reducing lists with
other operators.

=head1 Maps

=head2 Beware of nesting C<Map>s in sink context

Maps apply an expression to every element of a L<List|/type/List> and return a L<Seq|/type/Seq>:

    say <þor oðin loki>.map: *.codes; # OUTPUT: «(3 4 4)␤»

Maps are often used as a compact substitute for a loop, performing some
kind of action in the map code block:

    <þor oðin loki>.map: *.codes.say; # OUTPUT: «3␤4␤4␤»

The problem might arise when maps are nested and L<in a sink
context|/language/contexts#index-entry-sink_context>.

    <foo bar ber>.map: { $^a.comb.map: { $^b.say}}; # OUTPUT: «»

You might expect the innermost map to I<bubble> the result up to the outermost
map, but it simply does nothing. Maps return C<Seq>s, and in sink context the
innermost map will iterate and discard the produced values, which is why it
yields nothing.

Simply using C<say> at the beginning of the sentence will save the result from
sink context:

    say <foo bar ber>.map: *.comb.map: *.say ;
    # OUTPUT: «f␤o␤o␤b␤a␤r␤b␤e␤r␤((True True True) (True True True) (True True True))␤»

However, it will not be working as intended; the first C«f␤o␤o␤b␤a␤r␤b␤e␤r␤» is
the result of the innermost C<say>, but then L<C<say> returns a
C<Bool>|/routine/say#(Mu)_method_say>, C<True> in this case. Those C<True>s are
what get printed by the outermost C<say>, one for every letter. A much better
option would be to C<flat>ten the outermost sequence:

    <foo bar ber>.map({ $^a.comb.map: { $^b.say}}).flat
    # OUTPUT: «f␤o␤o␤b␤a␤r␤b␤e␤r␤»

Of course, saving C<say> for the result will also produce the intended result,
as it will be saving the two nested sequences from void context:

    say <foo bar ber>.map: { $^þ.comb }; # OUTPUT: « ((f o o) (b a r) (b e r))»

=head1 Smartmatching

The
L<smartmatch operator|/language/operators#index-entry-smartmatch_operator>
shortcuts to the right hand side I<accepting> the left hand side. This
may cause some confusion.

=head2 Smartmatch and C<WhateverCode>

Using C<WhateverCode> in the left hand side of a smartmatch does not
work as expected, or at all:

=begin code
my @a = <1 2 3>;
say @a.grep( *.Int ~~ 2 );
# OUTPUT: «Cannot use Bool as Matcher with '.grep'.  Did you mean to
# use $_ inside a block?␤␤␤»
=end code

The error message does not make a lot of sense. It does, however, if you
put it in terms of the C<ACCEPTS> method: that code is equivalent to
C<2.ACCEPTS( *.Int )>, but C<*.Int> cannot be
L<coerced to C<Numeric>|/routine/ACCEPTS#(Numeric)_method_ACCEPTS>,
being as it is a C<Block>.

Solution: don't use C<WhateverCode> in the left hand side of a
smartmatch:

=begin code
my @a = <1 2 3>;
say @a.grep( 2 ~~ *.Int ); # OUTPUT: «(2)␤»
=end code

=end pod
# vim: expandtab softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 ft=raku
